
A Strategic Guide for
Organizing Civil Society Field Hearings

A Strategic Guide for
Organizing Civil Society Field Hearings
From its founding, America has aspired to government by and for the people. Yet its most representative institution—the U.S. Congress—has struggled to keep pace with how people communicate and organize today. As new digital tools emerge, they open fresh opportunities for communities to be heard. Deliberative platforms, voice-to-data tools, and AI can help people share their lived experiences and collective insights directly with elected leaders. This guide offers a starting point. It shows how communities can gather testimony, create a shared public record, and turn civic voice into a lasting resource for both policymakers and the public.
Around the world, countries are going through transition and change. Old institutions are adapting to new communications methods and responding to demands for participation. This moment presents an opportunity.to increase civic voice in lawmaking.
Modern technology illuminates a path forward. These are digital tools—such as deliberative platforms, public archives, and community-run data cooperatives—that help people come together to share experiences, learn from one another, and find common ground. They turn public conversation into information that can be preserved, trusted, and used. In doing so, they renew core First Amendment practices of assembly and petition by creating safe, constructive spaces and lasting public records of what communities say, know and desire. Over time, these tools can build trust in shared data and strengthen relationships among neighbors, local news media, and elected leaders. They also arrive at a critical moment for the U.S. Congress. As lawmakers take on greater responsibility for writing clear, accountable laws—especially following recent guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court—these tools can help Congress listen more closely and govern in ways that better reflect the public it serves.
Congress is the bridge between the local and the national
Our Founders designed the U.S. House of Representatives to connect ordinary citizens to federal power. This guide offers a practical way to strengthen the connection between communities and Congress by building on an existing information sharing method--the committee hearing. It introduces Civil Society Field Hearings, a locally grounded model that helps communities share collective knowledge, support democratic participation, strengthen oversight, and create a public record that holds leaders accountable. The approach focuses on the U.S. House of Representatives and is designed to work alongside current systems, made possible by recent advances in technology and data reform. By demonstrating effective new practices, civil society can build public trust and show what is possible. Over time, these models may be adopted into official congressional workflows. For now, Civil Society Field Hearings contribute to a growing national movement to renew American democracy and bring elected officials closer to the communities they serve.
An official field hearing is a method Congress uses to gain "on the ground" perspectives on an issue. It is a feedback mechanism that began on the front lines during the Civil War. Today, official committee hearings typically happen on Capitol Hill. Yet committees in Congress also convene field hearings across the USA to include more local perspectives in the deliberative process. Similarly, Civil Society Field Hearings–though not official– will be initiated and organized in communities and feature local voices.


Peaceful protest is a long tradition in democracies around the world. Yet even Mahatma Gandhi emphasized that protest must be paired with constructive programs—approaches that build alternative systems rather than reflexive opposition. Constructive programs complement peaceful protest and reduce dependence on official systems by promoting self-reliance, education, and community empowerment. Civil Society Field Hearings represent this constructive approach to democratic renewal.
The COVID-19 pandemic showed how Congress can quickly adapt to maintain its representative duties during a crisis. Throughout the pandemic, members voted by proxy, introduced legislation electronically, and held committee hearings online—dramatically increasing witness diversity and expanding participation
These lessons point toward a resilient approach: using technology and decentralization to strengthen our democratic institutions. By moving some congressional functions online and into states, we can create a more accessible, inclusive system of governance that successfully continues through volatility and challenge. Today, states are the laboratories of democracy. Communities are the maker-spaces.
Civil Society Field Hearings differ from town halls. Because they simulate an official process, they are a more formal and curated method of gathering community input, creating a record, and connecting local experience to national decision-making. They build on the civic momentum generated by town halls and other sorts of gathering.
Civil Society refers to the networks of groups, communities, and associations between individuals and government—clubs, non-profit organizations, task forces, and membership organizations. It exists nationwide. This guide shows how Civil Society can take the lead in designing modern democratic methods, holding elected representatives accountable and restoring checks and balances.

Whether official or community-initiated, field hearings allow your representative to fulfill three roles:
Because Civil Society Field Hearings will be initiated locally by the community and centered on local civic voice, member attendance is desirable but not mandatory. The most important outcome: building muscles for modern democracy!
Congress plays a key role in overseeing the executive branch by reviewing public policy implementation, often through committee hearings that evaluate programs, address issues, and ensure agency accountability. Similarly, Civil Society Field Hearings aim to gather community input and become trusted, useful data providers.

Compelling testimony is crucial to a successful Civil Society Field Hearing. Witness selection should represent a cross-section of community perspectives with relevant expertise.
Preparation materials must include clear guidelines. Materials should clearly state that the event will be recorded. Witnesses should prepare written testimony of 500-1000 words. (1-4 pages) that can be delivered in 5-7 minutes. Please have a look at the Witness Prep document in the appendix for details. At the top of the document, please include:
Focus testimony on how policies affect the community, especially the members' constituents. Maintain decorum, answer questions respectfully, and provide compelling evidence.
Here are helpful organizing documents:
Please take a look at the appendices for details on the above items.
Defend the Constitution
